(e32) ibEconomy 2.0 Sneak Peak
#21
Posted 21 July 2011 - 07:12 AM
#22
Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:36 AM
sorry
i have upgraded the board at 3.2.0 but at this moment ibEconomy 1.5 is disabled.
can i enable it? it will work correclty?
#23
Posted 21 July 2011 - 09:48 AM
#24
Posted 21 July 2011 - 02:34 PM
we cannot use this
#25
Posted 21 July 2011 - 03:14 PM
#26
Posted 21 July 2011 - 04:30 PM
emoney, on 20 July 2011 - 03:31 PM, said:
Thanks,
I hope to be included on the BETA Testing team. I have looked through this site so far and haven't seen anything major. I also made that donation to you this morning as well as I am hopeful of one day having IPContent as part of your system (especially the stock part) so if someone writes x amount of "articles" their stocks go up, or posts "x" amount of blog posts etc.
But either way I am happy and the donation has been made
#27
Posted 21 July 2011 - 05:12 PM
#28
Posted 21 July 2011 - 05:59 PM
emoney, on 21 July 2011 - 05:12 PM, said:
Haha I know the feeling. As I previously said to you I try to donate (at least) to any modification I get - especially if it adds as much functionality to our site that your modification does.
I would urge everyone to donate to emoney though, yes I am new here and you may think I don't know what I am talking about but think about it - by donating to emoney it allows him to buy other IPS add-ons that he can build hooks/information into eg: Content/Blogs/Nexus (where members can purchase some credits/points) with enough donations he may be able to take a day off work or turn down the over time and spend it working on his modifications or adding features we have been asking for.
I have already donated and I have never used his system before (waiting for the 2.0 release) however I am still sitting here supporting him, coming up with ideas on how to improve/expand in the future versions of it - it's these things as a community we can do to help see this modification grow - imaging 3 months from now sitting there at emoney announcing that if you have IPNexus that your members are now able to purchase credits/points through it now (thus earning you more money for your site) wouldn't you feel good knowing you assisted in making it happen by donating.
Please I urge everyone to donate and help us together grow this modification, and the other ones that emoney makes.
My pay day is on monday emoney and I will see what I can do about getting you some more funds, otherwise it would have to wait until I can test/put IBEconomy on my site.
#29
Posted 21 July 2011 - 11:51 PM
#30
Posted 22 July 2011 - 07:57 AM
#31
Posted 22 July 2011 - 08:41 AM
Any ETA? Since we can't upgrade our forum until we have it or our users will kill us, they feel their points as their money, I believe that this is the most important application for our community.
Thanks for your hard work!
#32
Posted 25 July 2011 - 01:26 PM
#33
Posted 29 July 2011 - 12:36 AM
Look, I don't really like the way to add to cart items from the shop, it's not easier to put an "add to cart" button on the same line of the item.
Took me a while to find out that the arrow was to open a section, to add to cart.
Great job emoney!!
#34
Posted 29 July 2011 - 04:02 PM
That is one of the sacrifices I had to make in order to keep ibEconomy has "stock" as possible to avoid third-party skin conflicts, not to mention small screens like iPads and smaller monitors. There just isn't enough room to pack all that stuff in one row (I lied to myself in the first generation that there was).
But yeah, I'm always thinking of ways of refactoring and redesigning, and that is an idea that I haven't ruled out for a future setting.
#35
Posted 02 August 2011 - 07:17 PM
emoney, on 29 July 2011 - 04:02 PM, said:
That is one of the sacrifices I had to make in order to keep ibEconomy has "stock" as possible to avoid third-party skin conflicts, not to mention small screens like iPads and smaller monitors. There just isn't enough room to pack all that stuff in one row (I lied to myself in the first generation that there was).
But yeah, I'm always thinking of ways of refactoring and redesigning, and that is an idea that I haven't ruled out for a future setting.
Thanks to you to taking my suggestion in consideration
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










